Originally Posted by jonverbarg
Jeff was defiantly given the opportunity to vote, and he did. He gave his opinion, and was heard. As will happen from time to time not everyone will agree as to the best course of action. Thats why we have the system of a vote.
I guess we perceived the interaction differently.
I saw no votes for the first person nominated.
I saw 3 votes for you.
I saw Jeff try to continue the discussion without a voting opportunity and he got shut down.
Is this process legitimate... our charter is so ambiguous it doesn't matter.
I do appreciate that you addressed the issue in a positive way, though.
I really hoped this would start some conversation about updating the charter... maybe my methods were too passive agressive.
If I offended you, apologies.
I really just think we need some hindsight to see how we can improve as a club.