Northwest Disc Golf News Forums

Go Back   Northwest Disc Golf News Forums > Disc Golf Courses > Oregon: Southwestern OR > Whistler's Bend
Register Site Rules FAQ Members List Arcade Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #21  
Old May 7th, 2010, 07:25 AM
Adam Schneider
Join Date:
August 27th, 2008
Location:
SE Portland
Posts:
3,013
Default

Laser rangefinder is the best option by far, if you've got one handy. The only question then, on a hole like that, is whether to report the base of the triangle or the hypoteneuse.
________________________________________________________________________
Oregon disc golf map
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old May 7th, 2010, 11:46 AM
TreeLove
Join Date:
August 27th, 2008
Location:
Portland
Posts:
2,224
Default

Distance from tee to pin has got to be distance from tee to pin. It has just got to be. Hypotenuse. Otherwise, the stat is meaningless! What if a hole were 900 feet down, and 10 feet ahead? Is that a 10-foot hole? I think it cannot be....
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old May 7th, 2010, 11:57 AM
Adam Schneider
Join Date:
August 27th, 2008
Location:
SE Portland
Posts:
3,013
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TreeLove View Post
Distance from tee to pin has got to be distance from tee to pin. It has just got to be. Hypotenuse. Otherwise, the stat is meaningless! What if a hole were 900 feet down, and 10 feet ahead? Is that a 10-foot hole? I think it cannot be....
No, it's not a 10' hole... but you have to admit it doesn't take 900' of power!

Truth is, on most holes, it doesn't matter much. A 400' (horizontal) hole that goes up or down 50' is only 403'! WB#14's elevation is an extreme case; but even there, if it's 700' across and 150' down, the hypoteneuse is only 16' longer.
________________________________________________________________________
Oregon disc golf map
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old May 7th, 2010, 06:26 PM
TreeLove
Join Date:
August 27th, 2008
Location:
Portland
Posts:
2,224
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam Schneider View Post
No, it's not a 10' hole... but you have to admit it doesn't take 900' of power!
OK, fine, so the hole is 900 feet UP, and 10 feet forward: Now it requires LOTS of power! Is the hole:

a) 900 feet
b) 10 feet
c) more than 900 feet

Answer: C!
________________________________________________________________________
Ratings-based divisions: disc golf's inevitable future.
Disc Golf Calendar: www.NWDiscGolf.info, or click CALENDAR at top of page
Submit Event to Calendar: treelove@nwdiscgolf.info
Team Disc Golf: http://www.teamdiscgolf.com
Bitchin' URL: http://www.nwdiscgolf.com
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old May 7th, 2010, 10:13 PM
Adam Schneider
Join Date:
August 27th, 2008
Location:
SE Portland
Posts:
3,013
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TreeLove View Post
OK, fine, so the hole is 900 feet UP, and 10 feet forward: Now it requires LOTS of power! Is the hole:

a) 900 feet
b) 10 feet
c) more than 900 feet

Answer: C!
Sure, if you want to call 900.055 "more" than 900.
________________________________________________________________________
Oregon disc golf map
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old May 8th, 2010, 07:37 AM
Another Primate
Join Date:
January 20th, 2010
Location:
Grants Pass, Oregon
Posts:
74
Default

Another complication:
I watched Pina-the-third park it about thirty feet from the pin. So measuring through the air to the pin, for him, makes sense. When I throw, my goal is to put it at the bottom of the hill, this side of the road. Next shot, across the road and while it would be sweet to make it past the gully, it ain't gonna happen in most cases. Then up the hill to the pin. So if we were to make a triangle (not a right-angle triangle, either) out of that picture, Pina's got the top leg, and I have the other two legs (pad to bottom of gully to top of pin hill)... grinning... my route, even if I throw it straight, has to add many extra feet to that hole.
Yeah, I'm sure pin distances don't account for my "along the ground" route. But. What if it's more extreme than that, and even a good player can't count on his shots traveling that plane? Let's say Grizzly. Shouldn't the distances be measured between a pro's best shot points, then added together?
Oh, wait. That's stupid. Sorry. C'mon, Sue... the reason, the reason for distances, is "hey, how far away is that pin", not "how far am I gonna have to walk to get to that pin"?
Carry on.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old July 26th, 2010, 10:32 AM
Matt B.
Join Date:
August 30th, 2008
Location:
Eugene, OR
Posts:
1,647
Default Tee signs look great

I got a chance to see the new tee signs on the first few holes this weekend. Great job - those are some of the best tee signs I've seen, both in terms of accurate info and good looks. One question though - any thought to mounting them on posts insted of into the trees? I know the old signs were also in the trees so the parks people must be okay with it, but there's something kind of harsh about seeing these great new signs screwed right into living trees. It won't kill the tree, but it can injure them somewhat, and make a lot of sap run onto the sign, etc. And it just kind of hurts to look at.

I know posts and cement aren't free.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.