Northwest Disc Golf News Forums

Go Back   Northwest Disc Golf News Forums > Disc Golf Topics > DG Equipment
Register Site Rules FAQ Members List Arcade Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old May 5th, 2010, 12:56 AM
Wes Hansen
Join Date:
August 27th, 2008
Posts:
1,385
Default New TBird rim???

The BSF CFR Glow T has a different rim on it. The angle of rim is not the usual 90 degree angle as before. Is this a brand new change? Across the entire TBird family of discs? What is the affect on flight? Grip/release issues?

If this will be a permanent and lasting change I must know.

The TBird may be the only disc which losing the ability to use I would find insurmountable. Even the Roc and Aviar can be replaced with other discs.

(The final sentence was only added to rile up members of the Roc cult, in the hopes they might answer my TBird question to show their superior disc knowledge.)

If you've ever uttered something like, "This is my original mold San Marino I picked up in '89 right after they started using a softer plastic. They only used it until Summer of '91, when the new batch of plastic was a lot harder. This one is extra grippy, but with a nice stiff rim. Yesterday a guy offered me $300 for it, but I just laughed," then you are probably a member of the ROc cult.

Oh, crap. What about the TBird?????

Last edited by Wes Hansen; May 5th, 2010 at 12:58 AM. Reason: removed a "y"
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old May 5th, 2010, 01:59 AM
REDFIVE
Join Date:
August 29th, 2008
Location:
Sumner, WA
Posts:
1,244
Default

The teebird plus mold is lame. It is an experiment by dave at innova. They might be a permanent addition but I doubt they willreplace the regular teebird. There is also a roc plus.
________________________________________________________________________
Click here

Challenge disc golf
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old May 5th, 2010, 07:01 AM
ChUcK
Join Date:
March 25th, 2009
Posts:
699
Default

Your old teebird doesn't have a 90 degree angle either. Take a small carpenter's square and measure it if you are skeptical.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old May 5th, 2010, 09:56 AM
Wes Hansen
Join Date:
August 27th, 2008
Posts:
1,385
Default

90 used for point of reference. This mold definitely has a different angle to rim.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old May 5th, 2010, 09:58 AM
Bruce
Join Date:
October 11th, 2008
Location:
Oregon City, Oregon
Posts:
845
Default

I agree with Wes for once. Held last years cfr tee bird up to this years, and it is different. But flew very similar, and honestly I think the new ones feel better in my hand.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old May 5th, 2010, 10:06 AM
Wes Hansen
Join Date:
August 27th, 2008
Posts:
1,385
Default

Haven't held it long enough or thrown it yet.
Was thinking the lower angle would mean less snap off the fingers- more potential for early release if fingers slip sooner.
I've been talked into the longevity of the glow though.
Anyone know if this is a NEW mold to be used from now on, or a temp thing.
I REALLY have to get a stack of normal T's if so. I do not like buying discs

ps. (I do think that's the 14th time Bruce has agreed with me, but he's just embarrassed to admit it.)

Last edited by Wes Hansen; May 5th, 2010 at 10:08 AM. Reason: added the ps to be funny which may or may not be a 'reason," but that's why I was editing this post a minute ago
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old May 5th, 2010, 12:35 PM
Uhlman
Join Date:
July 30th, 2009
Location:
Pendleton, OR
Posts:
871
Default

I have one of the new Japan open ones, it feels a little different but it flies very much the same for me. I don't think it will affect my game with how much I throw the disc (which is a lot)
________________________________________________________________________
Throw What You Know.
"Gravity, she's a harsh mistress." -The Tick
PDGA# 45989
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old May 5th, 2010, 08:18 PM
ChUcK
Join Date:
March 25th, 2009
Posts:
699
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wes Hansen View Post
This mold definitely has a different angle to rim.
That's what I hear, but I haven't seen one yet. Is it comparable to the Riot slant?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old May 31st, 2010, 01:00 AM
grant
Join Date:
August 28th, 2008
Posts:
187
Default

picked one of these up at BSF yesterday, it feels better to me than my other teebirds but I have not thrown it yet to know, will post again when more field time has been done.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old May 31st, 2010, 01:07 AM
REDFIVE
Join Date:
August 29th, 2008
Location:
Sumner, WA
Posts:
1,244
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by grant View Post
picked one of these up at BSF yesterday, it feels better to me than my other teebirds but I have not thrown it yet to know, will post again when more field time has been done.
I thought it felt better in my hand too, until I kept releasing early because the rim angle is lame.
________________________________________________________________________
Click here

Challenge disc golf

Last edited by REDFIVE; May 31st, 2010 at 01:07 AM. Reason: didnt sound right.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old May 31st, 2010, 02:13 AM
Wes Hansen
Join Date:
August 27th, 2008
Posts:
1,385
Default

The first time I saw the rim I thought they screamed early release. I think there must be some physics geek that could explain the principle, but it MUST be harder to keep a grip on something with less of an angle. Right?
Thanks for the report.
Anyone else?
Bruce- any early release issues? When wet?
Uhlman?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old May 31st, 2010, 08:44 AM
Bruce
Join Date:
October 11th, 2008
Location:
Oregon City, Oregon
Posts:
845
Default

I don't own any of the new tee birds, I just tossed a couple in a field. But I didn't seem to have any release issues with them then. That was also a limited sample of throws to judge from.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old June 1st, 2010, 05:14 AM
Uhlman
Join Date:
July 30th, 2009
Location:
Pendleton, OR
Posts:
871
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wes Hansen View Post
The first time I saw the rim I thought they screamed early release. I think there must be some physics geek that could explain the principle, but it MUST be harder to keep a grip on something with less of an angle. Right?
Thanks for the report.
Anyone else?
Bruce- any early release issues? When wet?
Uhlman?
While the TeeBird isn’t my main driver I throw it two to three times a round. I have large hands and haven’t had a problem with early release. It does seem to relase more smooth though. While it feels different, it has the same flight as my regular TeeBirds (I am comparing old star and glow dx to new champ plastic here). I live in Pendleton… what’s rain? Seriously, mine are champion plastic and I have not encountered any issues with it that I don’t have with my other champ discs when wet.
________________________________________________________________________
Throw What You Know.
"Gravity, she's a harsh mistress." -The Tick
PDGA# 45989
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old June 1st, 2010, 08:40 PM
Wes Hansen
Join Date:
August 27th, 2008
Posts:
1,385
Default

U- Thanks for the input. Now you've made it a little harder not to try them- at least when dry.
Smoother release....
BUT, I have girl size hands.
undecided....
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old June 2nd, 2010, 06:20 AM
Uhlman
Join Date:
July 30th, 2009
Location:
Pendleton, OR
Posts:
871
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wes Hansen View Post
U- Thanks for the input. Now you've made it a little harder not to try them- at least when dry.
Smoother release....
BUT, I have girl size hands.
undecided....
I like it but my wife loves it.
________________________________________________________________________
Throw What You Know.
"Gravity, she's a harsh mistress." -The Tick
PDGA# 45989
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old September 14th, 2010, 08:29 AM
Rakoz
Join Date:
July 20th, 2010
Location:
Portland, OR
Posts:
238
Default

Is this similar to what they did with the Eagle a few years ago? I don't remember which came first but there was the L mold and the E mold and it changed the rim. They do fly different.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old September 14th, 2010, 03:16 PM
prospect
Join Date:
October 13th, 2009
Location:
Spokane
Posts:
185
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rakoz View Post
Is this similar to what they did with the Eagle a few years ago? I don't remember which came first but there was the L mold and the E mold and it changed the rim. They do fly different.
No. The Eagle L, E, and X molds are all products of different lips. Just as the Teebird and Teebird L are different. Notched lip versus straight lip. The new Teebird+ has a slightly angled inside rim that is supposed to provide a "beefier" feel in the hand, yet produce similar flight characteristics.
________________________________________________________________________
PDGA #42116
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old September 14th, 2010, 05:48 PM
jshrack
Join Date:
June 12th, 2010
Posts:
466
Talking <=== Physics geek

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wes Hansen View Post
I think there must be some physics geek that could explain the principle, but it MUST be harder to keep a grip on something with less of an angle. Right?
I believe you are talking about a 'Normal' force... it is considered when calculating frictional forces between two static objects. It varies directly with the cosine of the angle in question.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normal_force
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old October 31st, 2010, 01:49 AM
whalekillah
Join Date:
August 20th, 2010
Location:
Oregon
Posts:
477
Default

Is this just the Teebird +, or is this "new" rim angle going to continue through the rest of the Teebird runs? Kinda nervous because I use a Teebird quite a bit.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.