Northwest Disc Golf News Forums

Go Back   Northwest Disc Golf News Forums > Disc Golf Topics > DG Equipment
Register Site Rules FAQ Members List Arcade Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #21  
Old January 21st, 2010, 11:52 PM
killa
Join Date:
April 11th, 2009
Location:
Seattle
Posts:
195
Default the 2nd link is the meat and potatoes

I basically agree with the last 2 analyses, but the only piece of evidence I have to offer may not be one you guys will welcome with open arms -- the Epic by Aerobie.

This disc obviously has a unique "personality", if you will, but the feature I feel may be relevent is that the manufacturer indicates how to tune it for a desired stability: flex the edges up for more stability, and down for less. Practical application verifies the theory easily and undeniably. So at least for this disc, all other factors held constant, domey = less stable, and flat/concave = more stable.

And say what you will about the company and their golf discs, but these guys are onto something.

Also, great food for thought with that DGR link, Tim.
________________________________________________________________________
anything truly worth doing is not likely to be easy.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old January 22nd, 2010, 01:21 AM
REDFIVE
Join Date:
August 29th, 2008
Location:
Sumner, WA
Posts:
1,242
Default

Why the stabilities are different I don't know, but I do like my slower fairway drivers to be flat and my faster distance drivers to be domey.
I like my plastic dense and stiff, which seams to be a bit more stable. Usually flat for teebirds and firebirds but domey for destroyers and wraiths. The boss is just weird because it is so big and the many plastic combinations used to make it either lighter or heavier or grippier, or bossier are new to the market so they don't fit into the guidelines set by other discs. I do know that however they may fly compared to the next one can be learned with one short field session and no matter how stable or overstable the disc is it will still be crazy fast.
________________________________________________________________________
Click here

Challenge disc golf
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old January 22nd, 2010, 10:28 AM
Ol' Bob
Join Date:
August 28th, 2008
Location:
Club Mud
Posts:
4,296
Default

Where the rubber meets the road, so to speak, is the leading edge. I've seen some pretty flippy flat-tops. The larger share of the lift must be being generated in the first inch. Overall lift has to be a balance of combined lifts coming from both edge and flight plate.

Remember the old Aerobie Rings? They had essentially two wings, a leading and a trailing, and no flight plate at all. The leading wing roiled the air that the trailing wing passed through. This meant the leading wing got more lift than the trailing wing. To keep them all from flipping right, they put that little spoiler ridge along the outer edge. This killed enough of the lift on the leading wing to equalize its lift with the trailing wing. People were throwing them things a quarter mile, way back then. Of course the reason people quit buying them is that 99% of all Aerobie Rings thrown into a tree, stay in the tree.
________________________________________________________________________
I digress.

The system's not broken...

...it's fixed!

Last edited by Ol' Bob; January 22nd, 2010 at 10:46 AM. Reason: comma-kazzie
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old January 22nd, 2010, 10:44 AM
Ol' Bob
Join Date:
August 28th, 2008
Location:
Club Mud
Posts:
4,296
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by loocid View Post
So obviously it wouldn't meet PDGA specs, but what would happen if that design were used on a disc? Anyone ever cut the center out of a driver just to see?
I'm sure you'd see Flip City. Almost all the lift would be at the front.

Those Aerobie Rings were an eighth inch thick, at most. They were about ten inches in diameter and the ring was maybe an inch and a half wide with a steel armature or core. Very sharp leading and trailing edges, for nearly no drag. I wonder how far the big arms of today are slinging them?
________________________________________________________________________
I digress.

The system's not broken...

...it's fixed!
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old January 24th, 2010, 07:42 AM
papatart
Join Date:
December 29th, 2008
Posts:
147
Default

Leading edge baby, that's where a lot of it starts. As discs get beat in and the leading edge get beat downward the disc becomes more understable. Generally, when a disc of a certain mold is domey as opposed to a flat head disc of the same mold, the leading edge tends to be pointed down more and thereby less overstable. Flat plate brings the leading edge up and gives more overstable.

True, a generalization, but one that molders generally agree with on a genreal basis about general discs in general, generally speaking.

later,
Scott Papa
________________________________________________________________________
Team Discraft
Instructional Editor DiscGolfer Magazine
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old January 24th, 2010, 10:29 AM
Ol' Bob
Join Date:
August 28th, 2008
Location:
Club Mud
Posts:
4,296
Default

Personally, I believe the change that happens in a disc to make it less stable with use is due mostly to added turbulence over the top of the leading edge created by scratching and scarring. Most of the air's relative speed over the disc's surface is generated by the spin, and the fastest relative motion is over the top of the leading edge, with a relative speed advantage to the forward spinning side (i.e., left front for RHBH). As the disc becomes less smooth, the boundary layer turbulence increases and thickens, creating a higher virtual wing profile that the passing air must rise over. This lengthened path for the passing air lowers the pressure and adds lift at that point.

I can see varied shrinkage of the flight plate, cooling from the mold, being an initial factor in stability by pulling, or not pulling, the edge up, but I don't see edges being bent down significantly from use. I see scratching and scarring, not bending.

On edit: I also believe that beat-in discs often fly better because the added boundary layer turbulence acts as a lubricant and decreases overall drag of the disc.
________________________________________________________________________
I digress.

The system's not broken...

...it's fixed!

Last edited by Ol' Bob; January 24th, 2010 at 10:54 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.