Northwest Disc Golf News Forums

Go Back   Northwest Disc Golf News Forums > Disc Golf Courses > Washington: Eastern WA > Downriver
Register Site Rules FAQ Members List Arcade Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old October 10th, 2009, 05:58 AM
catalystdg
Join Date:
October 10th, 2009
Location:
spokane
Posts:
114
Default downriver course design

any one wanting to submit a design for the new downriver layout can do so
the only requirements is that there are no crossing fairways and please take safety and the vegetation into account.
all designs must be submitted to Bob Perrewe at bobperrewe@hotmail.com
by our next club meeting on nov 10
bob will foreward all designs anonymously on to me to look over and we will diside on one design by the end of nov.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old November 4th, 2009, 04:15 PM
catalystdg
Join Date:
October 10th, 2009
Location:
spokane
Posts:
114
Default

one week left
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old November 6th, 2009, 08:00 AM
Eric whippet Brown
Join Date:
April 22nd, 2009
Posts:
99
Default

I want to know if we can clear out some trees to make new fairways or what? I have some idea's that could make some nice holes with a few trees here and there moved out of the way.
________________________________________________________________________
I said whippet, whippet good.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old November 6th, 2009, 05:27 PM
General Scales
Join Date:
May 1st, 2009
Location:
Spokane Valley Washington
Posts:
1,524
Default

The only thing I would like to see @ Downriver is some par 4 holes. There is the length and amount of land that would be required. I'd love to see a combination of old 7 and 8 into one hole.

I'd also love to see the return of hole 6 but we all know that it interferes with so many things that it'll never happen.
________________________________________________________________________
"Honest work is for the downtrodden and the Polish"
Cleveland Brown
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old November 6th, 2009, 07:31 PM
Timber
Join Date:
April 19th, 2009
Posts:
78
Default

If Hole 5 goes away I'll be one happy camper
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old November 24th, 2009, 06:11 PM
catalystdg
Join Date:
October 10th, 2009
Location:
spokane
Posts:
114
Default

the layout for downriver is almost done( just need to find exact spots for the tees and pins but the overall layout has been picked)
i should have some maps in time for the meeting so you all can check it out.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old November 24th, 2009, 10:31 PM
Parks
Join Date:
April 1st, 2009
Posts:
1,295
Default

Whats the style of the new layout?

Is it supposed to be more beginner friendly, a more challenging course, something with alts for both, or what?
________________________________________________________________________
We're at our best when it's from our hips
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old November 25th, 2009, 07:52 AM
catalystdg
Join Date:
October 10th, 2009
Location:
spokane
Posts:
114
Default

it will be quite difficult with some very technical shots as well as a few long holes(450-600) hole 5 is the only remaining hole from the original layout
i will have alt pin possitions for for all the holes.(those might not be put in now but hopefully in the spring)
depending on the weather and what everyone want we could possibly change the course mid dec.
thanks to all who submitted designs( we are actually using a combination of three)
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old November 25th, 2009, 02:23 PM
Parks
Join Date:
April 1st, 2009
Posts:
1,295
Default

Sounds good, I'm pumped to try it out.
________________________________________________________________________
We're at our best when it's from our hips
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old November 30th, 2009, 10:33 AM
catalystdg
Join Date:
October 10th, 2009
Location:
spokane
Posts:
114
Default

the layout is ready and is looking pretty sweet
hope everyone can throw straight
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old December 1st, 2009, 09:08 AM
General Scales
Join Date:
May 1st, 2009
Location:
Spokane Valley Washington
Posts:
1,524
Default

Wait, does this mean you guys moved all the baskets for the new design or the new design is ready to but into play? It'd be frickin sweet to play new Downriver before the snow.

Any chance at getting a map posted up here so us non club members have a guide for the new layout?

And what is the SDGA membership costing these days?
________________________________________________________________________
"Honest work is for the downtrodden and the Polish"
Cleveland Brown
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old December 1st, 2009, 05:17 PM
Wobbly Bob
Join Date:
March 31st, 2009
Location:
Spokane, WA.
Posts:
697
Default Downriver reconfiguration

The SDGA Board has not seen the new layout yet, or approved it. Until that happens there will be no changes made. It is however our intention to create a new layout before Spring next year.
________________________________________________________________________
Fly free and straight to the pin!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old December 1st, 2009, 05:31 PM
catalystdg
Join Date:
October 10th, 2009
Location:
spokane
Posts:
114
Default

The final design will be approved and maps will be given out at the meeting.
i was going to let the rest of the board see the best two designs but since none of the designs met the criteria i had to combine a few different layouts,
the board voted to have me make the final desision so its just a formality of presenting the design at this point.
depending on the weather we could move everything mid dec.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old December 4th, 2009, 09:01 AM
Gordy #21004
Join Date:
March 31st, 2009
Posts:
600
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by catalystdg View Post
any one wanting to submit a design for the new downriver layout can do so
the only requirements is that there are no crossing fairways and please take safety and the vegetation into account.
all designs must be submitted to Bob Perrewe at bobperrewe@hotmail.com
by our next club meeting on nov 10
bob will foreward all designs anonymously on to me to look over and we will diside on one design by the end of nov.
At the Board meeting on Oct. 6th the decision was made to move forward with this design search. The plan was to have Chris review the submitted plans and refer (in his opinion) the stronger of the designs back to the Board for consideration. The Board was then going to do one of two things: either reach a conclusion on a design outright and adopt it, or present its conclusions and /or recommendations back to the membership. There was by no means any suggestion or instruction from the Board that Chris was to take over the entire plan process. The Board is still waiting for Chris to do what it appointed him to do; recommend two or three of the 5 designs submitted for it to consider and move forward from there. Moving forward would include disscusing and approving the scope of work and estimating what costs would be incurred.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old December 4th, 2009, 09:08 AM
Gordy #21004
Join Date:
March 31st, 2009
Posts:
600
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by catalystdg View Post
the layout for downriver is almost done( just need to find exact spots for the tees and pins but the overall layout has been picked)
i should have some maps in time for the meeting so you all can check it out.
The overall layout has been picked? Picked by who?You were supposed to refer the best of the design suggestions back to the Board for further review.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old December 4th, 2009, 09:36 AM
Gordy #21004
Join Date:
March 31st, 2009
Posts:
600
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by catalystdg View Post
The final design will be approved and maps will be given out at the meeting.
i was going to let the rest of the board see the best two designs but since none of the designs met the criteria i had to combine a few different layouts,
the board voted to have me make the final desision so its just a formality of presenting the design at this point.
depending on the weather we could move everything mid dec.
I don't understand what your saying here. Did you let part of the Board see these two designs? Was it this part of the Board that decided that none of the designs met the criteria. Was it this part of the Board that voted that the existing Board plan be scrapped and that the entire design process be usurped by you? You say you were going to let the "rest" of the Board see the designs but for some reason because they did not meet the criteria this was not necessary? What puts the other part of the Board on the 'in'? Are you saying now that you will decide what part of our process we will be involved in or not?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old December 4th, 2009, 10:37 AM
catalystdg
Join Date:
October 10th, 2009
Location:
spokane
Posts:
114
Default

we will have a bored meeting before the club meeting where this will be discussed.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old December 4th, 2009, 03:10 PM
Wobbly Bob
Join Date:
March 31st, 2009
Location:
Spokane, WA.
Posts:
697
Default What?

Maybe we need to have a Spokane Disc Golf Association Board or (Bored, this is something Jub would write) meeting sooner than Dec. 8 at 5pm to discuss this. I was under the impression that the Board/Bored had the final say, which as always gives us each one vote. Do we really want this going on, on the public forum. I make a motion that the Board meets Sunday at the Season Ticket at 6pm to iron this out.
________________________________________________________________________
Fly free and straight to the pin!
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old December 4th, 2009, 03:24 PM
Wobbly Bob
Join Date:
March 31st, 2009
Location:
Spokane, WA.
Posts:
697
Default My thoughts

Chris, it does seem to me that you have tried to hi-jacked the Board process. When I look at the meeting minutes they do state that you are to submit the best plans to the Board for consideration and approval (and while not stated I thought then recommendation to the club for approval). There wasn't any contigency plan set up in case all of the plans didn't meet the stated criteria. If none of the plans meet the criteria then maybe we should try again or with Board approval hire a professional to consult us on this matter.
________________________________________________________________________
Fly free and straight to the pin!
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old December 4th, 2009, 03:33 PM
roadhog
Join Date:
November 3rd, 2009
Location:
spokane valley, wa
Posts:
47
Default

hiring someone costs money that the club doesnt have. i, for one, feel that a combination of 2 ideas makes sense. it will combine the thoughts of two different people and probably make a good course. whats the difference of 2 days? meet to decide then meet to decide again? on tuesday chris can show the idea then we all vote on it, my opinion is that most people will like it. then its done. we as a club let the people that we put in charge of things handle them. then they report back by any means available. chris has been working on this and reporting progress back on this site, better then having a meeting every 2 days so he can report progress. he can give a lay out on tuesday and then we can yaa or naa it. i think that most will like it though, chris put alot of time into this one.
________________________________________________________________________
Work is for people that dont golf!!!!!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.