
June 1st, 2011, 06:21 AM
|
Join Date: August 30th, 2008
Location: Eugene, OR
Posts: 1,644
|  |
|
 |
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeverett
Hi Dr. Zaius,
*laugh* I wasn't really suggesting the hole should be a par 2.  I'm still technically at zero aces there.. *another* Buzzz shot blasted through the chains on it this weekend, though.  My putting lately has been terrible, though.. so no guarantees on a 2, regardless.
The par 2 thing comes from the PDGA guidelines.. at the blue level, a flat-elevation, lightly-wooded hole under 200ft. should be redesigned (rather than being a par 2), as it likely doesn't spread out the scoring distribution enough (by design, the goal is to have fewer than 70% of (Open) players score the same on a hole). Hole 11 short is roughly 185ft., with a slight uphill and a fair amount of OB.. thus kinda borderline. But I also don't think a hole needs to be short to give that "must get" feeling. Hole 1 short, for example.. that's a hole that feels like a "must get" birdie without being so short as to produce little scoring spread.
Meh, I'm rambling.. just ignore me.. Hole 11 short is ok. I'm looking forward to the weekend! 
|
Sounds like a great opportunity for someone with an interest and aptitude in math (I'm looking at you jeverett) to analyze the scoring spread on the holes at CG after this tournament.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|