View Single Post
  #41  
Old April 24th, 2011, 09:34 PM
psychodwarf
Join Date:
March 7th, 2010
Location:
anywhere i am at
Posts:
275
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Burge View Post
here's an idea--i'm sure it would cause all kinds of problems ...

if the teepad is on the road, it's an unsafe place to be.. from drives on #16;
if the teepad remains where it is now, it makes putting on #1 an unsafe place to be;
so...
how about changing the new tee for #1 into the tee for #11 ; changing the new tee for #17 into the tee for #1; and making the old unused tee for #1 into the new tee for #17...?

this would be a solution that would not have to 'grow', or be as obtrusive and expensive as nets, eliminates the issue of the #11 tee location altogether, creates three new challenging lines of approach (especially #11 and #17), could offer the possibility of a "b" pin location for #16, ...and could result in a whole new tangent of contention

...but seriously, it could be a solution to a lot of issues....no?
hey BURGE where the hell did this come out ? at last count you only had 2 brain cells AND they were BOTH fighting for air and a escape route OUT !! jk.. lol .. as for the layout it might work out..but it seems to be pretty good just to tried to think right now worked late on the courses out at four monds today will go by mon and look at that .

(P.S.) I HAVE ALREADY GOTTEN CALLS THAT THE NEW TEE PAD FOR #11 SUCKS. THANK YOU FOR LETTING ME NOW THAT ..

Last edited by psychodwarf; April 24th, 2011 at 09:44 PM.
Reply With Quote