[LJ Jubner]

Thanks for articulating the point Scott

I want to say this now I am not opposed to 4's and 5's just not at Seatac or at least it's current setup.

I can offer that over the last few years SeaTac has been "a try and get ahead of it project". Now that the transition period is happining the new group is organizing " as to finally get a handle on the TAC". Their efforts should be more than aplauded they should be attended.

There is talk about a third 9 that could include holes that are 4's and 5's. I would be totally fine with that.

The two holes 14,16 were moved only because players actually birdied them. I thought 14 should have stayed where it was. The current pin is exposed to drives from 16 (to my knowlege 5 players have been hit in Tournament play on this part of the course). In the first two or three CSI/Pats I offered a Temp basket for these two holes on Sat. AM 14 short , PM 16 short. There is some talk about either "planting to protect" the current 14 or moving it 75 ft back down the walking trail towards the 15 tee.

I really don't see any room for 12 to move back. A blind shot over last established public access trail at that end of the course seems risky.

Attachment
this is info from 2005-09 maybe 300 rounds each winter/ summer
First line hole numbers
second line Winter handicap 1 hardest 18 easiest
third line winter scoring average
forth line summer handicap 1 hardest 18 easiest
last line summer scoring average