Quote:
Originally Posted by catalystdg
for the record this was never the way i thought the course should be designed or the whole situation handled. I did not want to design the course. my opinion was and still is that it should be designed by board appointed commitee and the final design voted on by the members. i however could not get support on this idea. i do commend gordy for trying to work this out so the board could look like we were in agreement and proceed as a unit, something some members(from both sides of the issues) were not willing to do in the past and still refuse to do going foreward. this is the reason i am not returning to the club. until the board can actually do what it has commited to do ( which is only to promote disc golf ) and work together towards that singular goal instead of throwing little fits and trashtalking the other board members when things don't go our way( which has been done by EVERY board member myself included) i will no longer be a part of the problem. i am still working to promote disc golf but at this time i don't see that possible as a part of the sdga. I am currently installing two private courses and have been hired by another club to install their courses. so going foreward i see disc golf in the spokane area looking up
|
Everything everyone has done for the last ten years brings us to where we are today; looking up. It has seldom been easy. we pay our own way. There's probably no better time for us than today is, but the challanges are larger and our path forward is more complex. Players and others will be called upon more than before to give and to contribute. The constant, for better or worse, is still the SDGA. that name is the door-opener. Gordy