View Single Post
  #5  
Old December 28th, 2011, 03:12 PM
Parks
Join Date:
April 1st, 2009
Posts:
1,295
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LJ Jubner View Post
This is a very slippery slope. By proposing "an in attendance vote" you raise the possability of ...at a poorly attended club meeting , the club could be hijacked by the few in attendance at the expense of everyone.
This is exactly what a quorum for charter changes would prevent. Right now, we can have a scheduled membership meeting where only four Board Members show up and vote on a bunch of charter changes. I guess I don't see your point, or you don't see mine.

Quote:
Originally Posted by LJ Jubner View Post
A better compromise would be yearly examination of the charter or an amendment restricting how much of the charter can be changed at any one time.
Care to expand upon this some more?
________________________________________________________________________
We're at our best when it's from our hips
Reply With Quote