[coryreu]

First of all, this isn't an issue about who's gotten the most done in a given amount of time. And it isn't about who's designing credentials give them the right to build design. It's about getting this major project done right and going through the proper channels to get it done.
Secondly, having a meeting with a park official and getting their approval to do something, doesn't mean you just go do it. Minutes from the meeting with the park official should be taken and brought to the attention of the board.( this should be where you break out a tape recorder.)*see below.
Lastly, in regards to the idea of.. wait and see what we've done, and then give your opinion... isn't right. Of course good reviews will be given when people come play this course. It's like sticking a great big, shiny, new toy in front of a kid. They love it every time. Disc golfers have a mutual love of throwing discs into baskets. And if you give them a new place to do it, they love it even more.

*Usually when these recordings of conversations between Jeff and park officials are taken, they get written into a report and posted on these forums, which don't show total authenticity. The report sucks all of the air out of the thread right off the bat. Leaving questions to be answered which never are. Seemingly giving Jeff the feeling of accomplishment to do whatever he believes he has earned the right to do. Yes, he's gotten into the good graces of the city parks officials, which is totally and respectably noble. But that doesn't mean he can act solely on his own agenda. Currently, Jeff is only an informative between the city to the board, when he should be more focused on being a representative and co-worker for the SDGA .