Northwest Disc Golf News Forums

Northwest Disc Golf News Forums (http://www.nwdiscgolfnews.com/forum/index.php)
-   PDGA (http://www.nwdiscgolfnews.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   Epic Illegal? (http://www.nwdiscgolfnews.com/forum/showthread.php?t=6947)

General Scales April 6th, 2011 11:28 AM

Epic Illegal?
 
Did the PDGA outlaw the use of the Aerobee Epic this year in tournament play?

Chuck Kennedy April 6th, 2011 11:35 AM

Not that I know of. Where did you see that?

General Scales April 6th, 2011 12:00 PM

That is what I had heard. I thought I had read it somewhere on one of the many disc golf blogs around here. Perhaps it was a consideration? Question is, how is it even legal? It doesn't conform to a lot of the standards.

Chuck Kennedy April 6th, 2011 01:50 PM

Epic was "grandfathered" before the new standards were in updated that made it fall outside of specs. I post the official approved disc list so if it's still on there, then it's legal: http://www.pdga.com/documents/pdga-approved-discs-pdf

sillybizz April 6th, 2011 02:31 PM

Epic illegal? More like Epic fail. :D

EnigmaSquad April 6th, 2011 03:33 PM

Epic is Legal. New regulations make a disc illegal if it has a non-concentic rim (not centered) but the Epic was grandfathered. Therefore it is on the list that was previously posted.
This is my understanding anyway...:)

HarrisonH April 6th, 2011 06:25 PM

I love how in Disc Golf a disc produced/added to the PDGA approved list is considered "grandfathered" from 2003... or am I missing something?

jshrack April 6th, 2011 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HarrisonH (Post 94625)
I love how in Disc Golf a disc produced/added to the PDGA approved list is considered "grandfathered" from 2003... or am I missing something?

Huh? :confused:

captain jack April 6th, 2011 07:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jshrack (Post 94634)
Huh? :confused:


The Epic was approved by the PDGA way back in 'ought three.
Ancient times, like the Mesopotamian era.

I remember back then, Innova used to have this nice candy plastic, I think it was called C.E., or something.

Chuck Kennedy April 6th, 2011 09:27 PM

The disc standards that made the Epic fall outside the guidelines were updated effective Jan 1, 2008. So all discs approved prior to that date were grandfathered that fell outside any of the new specs. However, I think the Epic may have been one of the only discs that fell outside the new specs at that time.

General Scales April 7th, 2011 07:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chuck Kennedy (Post 94641)
The disc standards that made the Epic fall outside the guidelines were updated effective Jan 1, 2008. So all discs approved prior to that date were grandfathered that fell outside any of the new specs. However, I think the Epic may have been one of the only discs that fell outside the new specs at that time.

So what we are saying is that we have a disc that is illegal by today standards yet isn't because it was made before the rule change? This is ludicrous:slapface:. That should also mean that the turbo putter should be legal since it WAS legal till the PDGA took away it's approval.

Chuck Kennedy April 7th, 2011 08:18 AM

Quote:

So what we are saying is that we have a disc that is illegal by today standards yet isn't because it was made before the rule change? This is ludicrous. That should also mean that the turbo putter should be legal since it WAS legal till the PDGA took away it's approval.
Of course you played right into the follow up. The Turbo Putt was mistakenly approved by the Tech group due to a more liberal perception of what a "circular disc" meant. The Board determined that a circle could not have scallops and really needed to be a circle as stated in the specs existing at that time. The updated specs after that incident simply made that more clear. In addition, approvals were moved to the Board rather than just the Tech group to make sure similar misinterpretations didn't occur in the future. The Turbo shouldn't have been approved and that issue was resolved appropriately with the manufacturer.

The Board has every right to grandfather products that were made before the standards changed in the same way you can't be charged by a new law placed in effect after you did something that was legal at the time. There are targets that are currently grandfathered as Championship targets that do not yet meet all of the standards updated in February 2009. However, the specs on these targets and the Epic cannot be modified by the manufacturers without the modified versions meeting the new specs.

Ol' Bob April 7th, 2011 09:18 AM

Is the Epic just an eccentricity?

General Scales April 7th, 2011 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chuck Kennedy (Post 94664)
Of course you played right into the follow up. The Turbo Putt was mistakenly approved by the Tech group due to a more liberal perception of what a "circular disc" meant. The Board determined that a circle could not have scallops and really needed to be a circle as stated in the specs existing at that time. The updated specs after that incident simply made that more clear. In addition, approvals were moved to the Board rather than just the Tech group to make sure similar misinterpretations didn't occur in the future. The Turbo shouldn't have been approved and that issue was resolved appropriately with the manufacturer.

The Board has every right to grandfather products that were made before the standards changed in the same way you can't be charged by a new law placed in effect after you did something that was legal at the time. There are targets that are currently grandfathered as Championship targets that do not yet meet all of the standards updated in February 2009. However, the specs on these targets and the Epic cannot be modified by the manufacturers without the modified versions meeting the new specs.

Well, that actually makes a lot of sense. I don't use either disc so it never bothers me. Thank you Chuck for the clarifications. :yay:

Chuck Kennedy April 7th, 2011 12:46 PM

Quote:

Is the Epic just an eccentricity?
Definitely off-centric...

jshrack April 7th, 2011 11:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chuck Kennedy (Post 94598)
I post the official approved disc list so if it's still on there, then it's legal: http://www.pdga.com/documents/pdga-approved-discs-pdf

I don't think you could have been more clear... thank you!:trophy:

Uhlman April 8th, 2011 08:00 AM

The real question is, who in thier right mind would throw the Epic in a tourniment?

Ol' Bob April 8th, 2011 08:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Uhlman (Post 94801)
The real question is, who in thier right mind would throw the Epic in a tourniment?

Someone with a strong thumb, a big arm, and a good rotator cuff.

barbikes April 8th, 2011 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Uhlman (Post 94801)
The real question is, who in thier right mind would throw the Epic in a tourniment?

I happen to have the answer to that question. This guy:

http://www.pdga.com/player_stats/41218/2011

Notice his current rating is 970.

I was lucky enough to get to play a round with him at DeLaveaga about three years ago. He carries several Epics and can throw them 400 feet plus using an overhand throw similar to throwing a baseball. In fact he used to be a baseball pitcher. It seems that a lot of guys that like the Epic used to be baseball pitchers. He would throw it high just like he was throwing in from deep outfield to homeplate and it would corkscrew about three times and then pull out and glide in steep, fast, and straight right at the basket. It was an incredible thing to see. He also swears by the Aerobie Arrow for putting. All I can say about that is he is a much better putter than I am!

Toby Puttzinski April 8th, 2011 07:57 PM

I'd say it's the Indian, not the arrow.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:13 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.