PDA

View Full Version : Lilac City Open Hole #1


Wobbly Bob
June 5th, 2011, 01:12 PM
During the Lilac City Open, hole #1 at Downriver was moved back about 40 feet and a little to the right of where it was.

This poll is to find out what our local players thought about the temporary pin position.

Burge
June 5th, 2011, 01:16 PM
Yeah!:yay: Keep it! It should stay that way for a multitude of reasons that have been expressed on numerous threads in numerous ways, ad infinitum.

Sean Johnson
June 5th, 2011, 07:09 PM
I think that this is a much better hole than the old placement. It's safer, more difficult, and simply more fun. Plus, there is definitely an ace run just waiting to happen there. :trophy:

ScottW
June 5th, 2011, 07:49 PM
I did like the new longer position on hole 1 as well. I like the fact that there are 2 sleeves there which allow the hole to be changed up a bit on occasion which is always nice. If I had to pick just one position I would go with the newer longer one but prefer the idea of using both.

psychodwarf
June 5th, 2011, 10:00 PM
I did like the new longer position on hole 1 as well. I like the fact that there are 2 sleeves there which allow the hole to be changed up a bit on occasion which is always nice. If I had to pick just one position I would go with the newer longer one but prefer the idea of using both.

there are THREE pin placements on hole #1 there is a shorter one same as the longer but to the right ..

CityLightsBurn
June 6th, 2011, 12:21 PM
I fully support the #1 changes. Adds difficulty without changing it up too much. The changes to #6 were a totally different story... All I can say is I'm glad the old is back.

General Scales
June 6th, 2011, 01:01 PM
I definitely like not getting bombed on by the big turnover from 11. I also like the fact that there is really only one clear route and it's straight down there. There is a sidearm hyzer and a HUGE backhand hyzer line at it. Definitely not the way I'd play the hole though. I'm going to say as well that I really did enjoy hole 6 for the tournament. Was not as bad as everyone made it out to seem. I had an easy time carding the 3 and if I'd putted better that day, it was an easy 2.

Burge
June 6th, 2011, 06:47 PM
All I can say is I'm glad the old is back.

I concur...the old #6 (which is really the old #7) needs to remain. First time I ever hit a tree, during my very first round, was on old #7....good times.

Now, let's start playing the old #8 backwards....but from the tee at the top of the hill. Yeah...get out the big sky-hyzer for that! HOOOAAHH!:drool:

Yoduh
June 6th, 2011, 10:44 PM
Well everybody so far wants to keep the new change and yet it's back where it was.. I don't understand. Same with hole 11. 6 needs an ob line between 9.

Burge
June 7th, 2011, 05:23 AM
...yet it's back where it was.. I don't understand.

I share your bewilderment...:chinscratch:

Wobbly Bob
June 7th, 2011, 07:09 AM
Number one is back in the original position because it was a temporary change for the tournament.

I wouldn't want anyone saying that I was redesigning the course with out club approval.

As for number eleven, someone disliked it enough to tear large holes in a $125 rubber mat. So it's back where it was.

As is six.

Burge
June 7th, 2011, 01:07 PM
I wouldn't want anyone saying that I was redesigning the course with out club approval.


You know, Bob, there's really only one particular person that would go so far as to accuse you of such a heinous act:rolleyes2: -- and he doesn't even like to play DR...oh, that's right...he doesn't like to play DR because you're always out there changing it:slapface: silly me....